Supercomputers/Systems/Sequoia
USA · decommissioned · classified
Sequoia
Also known as BlueGene/Q, Blue Gene/Q
Operated by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory at Livermore Computing Center .
Phase 1 seed dataset, compiled by hand. These rows were built from public operator, laboratory and vendor sources. A mechanical second-reader pass has since fetched every cited source: 1263 of 1345 systems have a readable citation that names them, and 56 are genuinely weakly sourced. Every claim carries its source and a confidence tier. Treat anything below verified as a lead, not a citation.
Measured performance
- Rmax
- 17.17 PFlop/s
- Rpeak
- 20.13 PFlop/s
- Rmax ÷ Rpeak
- 85.3%
- Cores
- 1,572,864
- Power
- 7.89 MW
- Per watt
- 2.2 GF/W
Figures are as last publicly reported for the configuration described below, not a live measurement. Where a system was upgraded in place, the post-upgrade configuration is shown and the earlier one appears in the timeline.
What this machine is made of
One row per supplier relationship. “Supplier at build” is the company that shipped the part at the time; where that company has since been acquired, the parent it rolls up to today is shown beside it. That distinction is what makes ticker-level aggregation possible across a thirty-year dataset.
| Role | Part | Supplier at build | Quantity | Confidence | Source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Integrator | - IBM BlueGene/Q | IBM | - | Reported | hpc.llnl.govenergy.gov |
| CPU | IBM PowerPC A2 (Power BQC) CPUs PowerPC A2 · 18C · 1.6 GHz · 45 nm · 55 W Power BQC 16C 1.60 GHz | IBM | - | Reported | hpc.llnl.govenergy.gov |
| Interconnect | IBM BlueGene/Q 5D torus Interconnect 5D torus · 2 GB/s per link per direction 5D torus | IBM | - | Reported | hpc.llnl.govenergy.gov |
| Storage | IBM Spectrum Scale ESS (GPFS) Storage Parallel filesystem (GPFS), erasure-coded declustered RAID · 250 PB on Summit (Alpine) · About 2.5 TB/s IBM GPFS | IBM | - | Reported | hpc.llnl.govenergy.gov |
| Cooling | Direct liquid cooling, warm water Cooling Direct-to-chip cold plates, facility water loop · Removes 90+ percent of node heat to liquid IBM BlueGene/Q: water cooled | IBM | - | Reported | hpc.llnl.govenergy.gov |
| Operating system | IBM Compute Node Kernel Operating systems Microkernel, no dynamic scheduling · Proprietary Compute Node Kernel | IBM | - | Reported | hpc.llnl.govenergy.gov |
The read
The high-water mark of the BlueGene line: 1.57 million cores at 1.6 GHz, and an Rmax-to-Rpeak ratio of 85% that most heterogeneous systems still do not reach. Like every BlueGene, the fabric is IBM's own and appears in no spec string as a separate vendor, which is why fabric-share charts that read only the interconnect field understate IBM's historical position.
Timeline
- 2009 Announced source
- 2012-06 List debut at #1 (June 2012) source
- 2012-06 First operational source
- 2020-01 Decommissioned January 31 to make room for the incoming El Capitan system source
- 2020-01 Decommissioned source
Public list appearances
Pointers only: rank and edition, linking to the canonical entry. We do not reproduce list tables. See sourcing policy.
Site & facility
Livermore Computing Center
- Location
- Livermore, CA, USA
- Cooling
- Direct liquid cooling (warm water)
- Commissioned
- 1996
Source check
We fetched this system's own citations and recorded whether each page actually mentions it. This is a corroboration signal, not a fact check, and it is published so you can see how well the sourcing holds up rather than take it on trust.
| Cited source | Result | Found on the page |
|---|---|---|
| asc.llnl.gov | names system and part | IBM Compute Node Kernel |
| top500.org | names system and part | IBM BlueGene/Q 5D torus |
Checked 2026-10-13 by pnpm verify. Re-run it and the table changes with the web.
Further reading
Power and cooling
Why air ran out at 20 kW a rack, how warm-water cooling removes the chillers, and what PUE conceals.
Inside a node
Latency-optimised versus throughput-optimised processors, NUMA, and the end of the host-to-device copy.
Operating a supercomputer
Acceptance testing, why "installed" and "in production" are six months apart, and the machine lifecycle.