COMPUTE ATLAS Supercomputer supply-chain graph
1345 systems 511 sites Sourced data

Supercomputers/Analysis/Public-market exposure

Analysis 06

Public-market exposure by ticker

29 listed companies supply parts to the systems in this dataset. The useful number is not the total: it is the split inside it. NVDA spreads its exposure across 809 systems with only 11% in its largest; VRT has 100% of its exposure in Leonardo alone. Those are different risks wearing the same headline.

This is a breadth measure, not revenue and not attributable share. An integrator and a memory supplier in the same machine each count its full Rmax here, because we have no public basis for splitting a system's value between roles. A large bar means a company appears in machines representing a lot of installed capability. It does not mean it captured a proportionate share of the spend, and it must not be read as a sales figure. Nothing on this site is investment advice.

Phase 1 seed dataset, compiled by hand. These rows were built from public operator, laboratory and vendor sources. A mechanical second-reader pass has since fetched every cited source: 1263 of 1345 systems have a readable citation that names them, and 56 are genuinely weakly sourced. Every claim carries its source and a confidence tier. Treat anything below verified as a lead, not a citation.

Read the shape, not the spikes. This is the installed base of the 1345 systems in this dataset: a curated seed chosen for supply-chain diversity, not a census of the market. At that sample size one machine entering or leaving service moves a share line by tens of points, so year-to-year jumps are composition effects rather than market events. The multi-year trends are the part worth quoting; the individual steps usually have one system's name on them, and the table view under the chart will tell you which.

  • Largest single system
  • All other systems
Aggregate FLOPS exposure by ticker Horizontal bars of aggregate installed FLOPS in systems each listed company supplies any part of, split into the largest single system and everything else. HPE Hewlett Packard Enterprise Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) 340 systems 9128 PFlop/s aggregate largest: El Capitan at 1809 PFlop/s (20%) Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) 340 systems 9128 PFlop/s aggregate largest: El Capitan at 1809 PFlop/s (20%) 20% in one NVDA NVIDIA NVIDIA (NVDA) 809 systems 8884 PFlop/s aggregate largest: JUPITER at 1000 PFlop/s (11%) NVIDIA (NVDA) 809 systems 8884 PFlop/s aggregate largest: JUPITER at 1000 PFlop/s (11%) 11% in one AMD AMD AMD (AMD) 307 systems 7165 PFlop/s aggregate largest: El Capitan at 1809 PFlop/s (25%) AMD (AMD) 307 systems 7165 PFlop/s aggregate largest: El Capitan at 1809 PFlop/s (25%) 25% in one INTC Intel Intel (INTC) 610 systems 5794 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Aurora at 1012 PFlop/s (17%) Intel (INTC) 610 systems 5794 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Aurora at 1012 PFlop/s (17%) 17% in one IBM IBM IBM (IBM) 246 systems 4364 PFlop/s aggregate largest: JUPITER at 1000 PFlop/s (23%) IBM (IBM) 246 systems 4364 PFlop/s aggregate largest: JUPITER at 1000 PFlop/s (23%) 23% in one ATO Atos Atos (ATO) 85 systems 2083 PFlop/s aggregate largest: JUPITER at 1000 PFlop/s (48%) Atos (ATO) 85 systems 2083 PFlop/s aggregate largest: JUPITER at 1000 PFlop/s (48%) 48% in one DELL Dell Technologies Dell Technologies (DELL) 120 systems 832 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Maximus-02 at 156 PFlop/s (19%) Dell Technologies (DELL) 120 systems 832 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Maximus-02 at 156 PFlop/s (19%) 19% in one MSFT Microsoft Microsoft (MSFT) 18 systems 758 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Eagle at 561 PFlop/s (74%) Microsoft (MSFT) 18 systems 758 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Eagle at 561 PFlop/s (74%) 74% in one 6702 Fujitsu Fujitsu (6702) 49 systems 686 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Fugaku at 442 PFlop/s (64%) Fujitsu (6702) 49 systems 686 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Fugaku at 442 PFlop/s (64%) 64% in one 992 Lenovo Lenovo (992) 68 systems 515 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Harpia at 75 PFlop/s (15%) Lenovo (992) 68 systems 515 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Harpia at 75 PFlop/s (15%) 15% in one NBIS Nebius Nebius (NBIS) 8 systems 249 PFlop/s aggregate largest: ISEG2 at 202 PFlop/s (81%) Nebius (NBIS) 8 systems 249 PFlop/s aggregate largest: ISEG2 at 202 PFlop/s (81%) 81% in one VRT Vertiv Vertiv (VRT) 2 systems 241 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Leonardo at 241 PFlop/s (100%) Vertiv (VRT) 2 systems 241 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Leonardo at 241 PFlop/s (100%) 100% in one SMCI Supermicro Supermicro (SMCI) 27 systems 223 PFlop/s aggregate largest: NIPA (Kakao) at 69 PFlop/s (31%) Supermicro (SMCI) 27 systems 223 PFlop/s aggregate largest: NIPA (Kakao) at 69 PFlop/s (31%) 31% in one 2357 ASUS ASUS (2357) 8 systems 211 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Nano 4 at 82 PFlop/s (39%) ASUS (2357) 8 systems 211 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Nano 4 at 82 PFlop/s (39%) 39% in one AVGO Broadcom Broadcom (AVGO) 5 systems 203 PFlop/s aggregate largest: MAXIMUS-384 at 115 PFlop/s (57%) Broadcom (AVGO) 5 systems 203 PFlop/s aggregate largest: MAXIMUS-384 at 115 PFlop/s (57%) 57% in one 6701 NEC NEC (6701) 37 systems 102 PFlop/s aggregate largest: AOBA-S at 17 PFlop/s (17%) NEC (6701) 37 systems 102 PFlop/s aggregate largest: AOBA-S at 17 PFlop/s (17%) 17% in one 603019 Sugon Sugon (603019) 13 systems 19 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Sugon Advanced Computing System PreE at 4 PFlop/s (23%) Sugon (603019) 13 systems 19 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Sugon Advanced Computing System PreE at 4 PFlop/s (23%) 23% in one 000977 Inspur Inspur (000977) 2 systems 16 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Lyapunov at 13 PFlop/s (80%) Inspur (000977) 2 systems 16 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Lyapunov at 13 PFlop/s (80%) 80% in one NETWEB Netweb Technologies Netweb Technologies (NETWEB) 2 systems 9 PFlop/s aggregate largest: AIRAWAT-PSAI at 9 PFlop/s (96%) Netweb Technologies (NETWEB) 2 systems 9 PFlop/s aggregate largest: AIRAWAT-PSAI at 9 PFlop/s (96%) 96% in one PSTG Pure Storage Pure Storage (PSTG) 3 systems 8 PFlop/s aggregate largest: The F.I.N at 8 PFlop/s (100%) Pure Storage (PSTG) 3 systems 8 PFlop/s aggregate largest: The F.I.N at 8 PFlop/s (100%) 100% in one 6501 Hitachi Hitachi (6501) 14 systems 7 PFlop/s aggregate largest: JMA Cray XC50 at 6 PFlop/s (79%) Hitachi (6501) 14 systems 7 PFlop/s aggregate largest: JMA Cray XC50 at 6 PFlop/s (79%) 79% in one STX Seagate Seagate (STX) 2 systems 6 PFlop/s aggregate largest: AWE Damson at 3 PFlop/s (52%) Seagate (STX) 2 systems 6 PFlop/s aggregate largest: AWE Damson at 3 PFlop/s (52%) 52% in one 688041 Hygon Hygon (688041) 1 systems 4 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Sugon Advanced Computing System PreE at 4 PFlop/s (100%) Hygon (688041) 1 systems 4 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Sugon Advanced Computing System PreE at 4 PFlop/s (100%) 100% in one META Meta Platforms Meta Platforms (META) 11 systems 3 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Facebook DGX-1 Cluster at 3 PFlop/s (100%) Meta Platforms (META) 11 systems 3 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Facebook DGX-1 Cluster at 3 PFlop/s (100%) 100% in one MRVL Marvell Marvell (MRVL) 1 systems 2 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Astra at 2 PFlop/s (100%) Marvell (MRVL) 1 systems 2 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Astra at 2 PFlop/s (100%) 100% in one ORCL Oracle Oracle (ORCL) 14 systems 2 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Red Sky at 0 PFlop/s (27%) Oracle (ORCL) 14 systems 2 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Red Sky at 0 PFlop/s (27%) 27% in one AMZN Amazon Amazon (AMZN) 8 systems 1 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Amazon EC2 C3 Instance Cluster at 0 PFlop/s (67%) Amazon (AMZN) 8 systems 1 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Amazon EC2 C3 Instance Cluster at 0 PFlop/s (67%) 67% in one CSCO Cisco Cisco (CSCO) 3 systems 0 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Thunderbird at 0 PFlop/s (50%) Cisco (CSCO) 3 systems 0 PFlop/s aggregate largest: Thunderbird at 0 PFlop/s (50%) 50% in one AAPL Apple Apple (AAPL) 1 systems 0 PFlop/s aggregate largest: System X at 0 PFlop/s (100%) Apple (AAPL) 1 systems 0 PFlop/s aggregate largest: System X at 0 PFlop/s (100%) 100% in one 0k2k5k7k9k
Bar length is aggregate installed Rmax across every system the company supplies any part of. The first segment is its single largest system, so a bar that is mostly one colour is a company whose exposure is one programme.
Table view: Aggregate FLOPS exposure by ticker
TickerCompanySystemsAggregate RmaxConcentrationLargest systemRolesSpan
HPE · NYSEHewlett Packard Enterprise3409.13 EFlop/s20%El CapitanCooling, CPU, Integrator, Interconnect, Operating system, Storage1976–2026
NVDA · NASDAQNVIDIA8098.88 EFlop/s11%JUPITERAccelerator, Cooling, CPU, Integrator, Interconnect2003–2026
AMD · NASDAQAMD3077.16 EFlop/s25%El CapitanAccelerator, CPU2003–2026
INTC · NASDAQIntel6105.79 EFlop/s17%AuroraAccelerator, Cooling, CPU, Integrator, Interconnect, Storage1991–2026
IBM · NYSEIBM2464.36 EFlop/s23%JUPITERAccelerator, Cooling, CPU, Integrator, Interconnect, Operating system, Storage1995–2026
ATO · EPAAtos852.08 EFlop/s48%JUPITERCooling, Integrator, Interconnect, Operating system, Storage2006–2026
DELL · NYSEDell Technologies120831.9 PFlop/s19%Maximus-02Cooling, Integrator, Storage2003–2026
MSFT · NASDAQMicrosoft18757.6 PFlop/s74%EagleIntegrator, Operating system2008–2025
6702 · TSEFujitsu49686.0 PFlop/s64%FugakuCooling, CPU, Integrator, Interconnect, Operating system, Storage1993–2025
992 · HKEXLenovo68514.9 PFlop/s15%HarpiaCooling, Integrator, Storage2003–2025
NBIS · NASDAQNebius8248.9 PFlop/s81%ISEG2Integrator2023–2025
VRT · NYSEVertiv2241.2 PFlop/s100%LeonardoCooling, Power2022–2026
SMCI · NASDAQSupermicro27223.2 PFlop/s31%NIPA (Kakao)Cooling, Integrator, Storage2006–2026
2357 · Taiwan Stock ExchangeASUS8210.9 PFlop/s39%Nano 4Integrator2012–2025
AVGO · NASDAQBroadcom5202.6 PFlop/s57%MAXIMUS-384Interconnect2024–2025
6701 · TSENEC37102.2 PFlop/s17%AOBA-SAccelerator, Cooling, CPU, Integrator, Interconnect, Operating system, Storage1994–2026
603019 · SSESugon1318.62 PFlop/s23%Sugon Advanced Computing System PreECooling, Integrator, Interconnect2004–2026
000977 · SZSEInspur215.99 PFlop/s80%LyapunovIntegrator2020–2020
NETWEB · NSENetweb Technologies28.89 PFlop/s96%AIRAWAT-PSAIIntegrator2013–2023
PSTG · NYSEPure Storage37.57 PFlop/s100%The F.I.NStorage2024–2025
6501 · TSEHitachi147.22 PFlop/s79%JMA Cray XC50Cooling, CPU, Integrator, Interconnect, Operating system, Storage1993–2018
STX · NASDAQSeagate26.25 PFlop/s52%AWE DamsonStorage2015–2017
688041 · SSEHygon14.33 PFlop/s100%Sugon Advanced Computing System PreECPU2018–2018
META · NASDAQMeta Platforms113.31 PFlop/s100%Facebook DGX-1 ClusterCooling, Integrator, Storage2017–2024
MRVL · NASDAQMarvell11.83 PFlop/s100%AstraCPU2018–2018
ORCL · NYSEOracle141.62 PFlop/s27%Red SkyCPU, Integrator, Interconnect, Storage2000–2010
AMZN · NASDAQAmazon8724.27 TFlop/s67%Amazon EC2 C3 Instance ClusterAccelerator, Integrator, Interconnect2011–2026
CSCO · NASDAQCisco392.44 TFlop/s50%ThunderbirdInterconnect2005–2008
AAPL · NASDAQApple110.28 TFlop/s100%System XOperating system2003–2003
How this was calculated

A company is counted as present in a system if it supplies any component edge in any role: integrator, CPU, accelerator, interconnect, storage, cooling, power or operating system. Aggregate Rmax is the sum of those systems' last reported performance figures.

Exposure follows the acquisition chain. Systems shipped by Cray count toward HPE, and fabrics shipped by Mellanox count toward NVIDIA, because the question this page asks is which listed entity carries the exposure today. The build-time supplier is preserved on every system page; it is only the rollup that moves.

Rows are grouped by ticker rather than by company, so a subsidiary and its parent sharing a listing appear once. Eviden and Atos are the case here: they share ATO, and listing them separately would double-count European exposure.

Concentration is the largest single system's Rmax as a share of the aggregate. It is a deliberately crude measure and reads correctly at both ends: 100% means the exposure is one machine, and a low figure means it is spread.

What this page will not do. §6.6 asks for FLOPS “attributable” to each ticker, which implies weighting a system's value across the roles in it. We do not publish that, because we have no public basis for the weights and an invented weighting would be indistinguishable from a real one once it had been quoted. Role-weighted attribution ships when a defensible method does, and not before.

The read

The first thing the split shows is that concentration and scale are not the same property, and the largest exposures are not the most concentrated ones. NVIDIA appears in more systems than anyone here and has the lowest concentration of the large names, it is in almost everything, in several different roles, across two decades. HPE has the largest aggregate but a third of it sits in a single machine.

The second is that role breadth matters as much as system count. A company present as integrator, interconnect, storage, cooling and operating system in the same machine has five relationships with that customer; a company present only as the accelerator has one, and it is the one most easily substituted at the next procurement. The Roles column in the table is the part of this analysis that a share chart cannot show.

The third is the tail. Several listed suppliers carried in this graph appear in exactly one system, and one appears in a machine that has been retired for years. Those rows are not noise: they are what a supplier's position looks like on the way in or on the way out, and the span column says which.

A caution about what is missing. This page can only see companies that appear as a supplier edge in our data, which is heavily weighted toward compute, fabric and integration. Memory, foundry and facility suppliers are carried in the parts taxonomy but have few system edges, so TSMC, which fabricates essentially all the leading-edge silicon on this site: does not appear here at all. The most concentrated dependency in the entire graph is invisible on this chart, and that is a limitation of the edge data, not a finding.

All listed suppliers

TickerCompanySystemsAggregate Rmax ConcentrationLargest systemRoles
HPENYSE Hewlett Packard Enterprise 340 9.13 EFlop/s 20% El Capitan cooling, cpu, integrator, interconnect, os, storage
NVDANASDAQ NVIDIA 809 8.88 EFlop/s 11% JUPITER accelerator, cooling, cpu, integrator, interconnect
AMDNASDAQ AMD 307 7.16 EFlop/s 25% El Capitan accelerator, cpu
INTCNASDAQ Intel 610 5.79 EFlop/s 17% Aurora accelerator, cooling, cpu, integrator, interconnect, storage
IBMNYSE IBM 246 4.36 EFlop/s 23% JUPITER accelerator, cooling, cpu, integrator, interconnect, os, storage
ATOEPA Atos 85 2.08 EFlop/s 48% JUPITER cooling, integrator, interconnect, os, storage
DELLNYSE Dell Technologies 120 831.9 PFlop/s 19% Maximus-02 cooling, integrator, storage
MSFTNASDAQ Microsoft 18 757.6 PFlop/s 74% Eagle integrator, os
6702TSE Fujitsu 49 686.0 PFlop/s 64% Fugaku cooling, cpu, integrator, interconnect, os, storage
992HKEX Lenovo 68 514.9 PFlop/s 15% Harpia cooling, integrator, storage
NBISNASDAQ Nebius 8 248.9 PFlop/s 81% ISEG2 integrator
VRTNYSE Vertiv 2 241.2 PFlop/s 100% Leonardo cooling, power
SMCINASDAQ Supermicro 27 223.2 PFlop/s 31% NIPA (Kakao) cooling, integrator, storage
2357Taiwan Stock Exchange ASUS 8 210.9 PFlop/s 39% Nano 4 integrator
AVGONASDAQ Broadcom 5 202.6 PFlop/s 57% MAXIMUS-384 interconnect
6701TSE NEC 37 102.2 PFlop/s 17% AOBA-S accelerator, cooling, cpu, integrator, interconnect, os, storage
603019SSE Sugon 13 18.62 PFlop/s 23% Sugon Advanced Computing System PreE cooling, integrator, interconnect
000977SZSE Inspur 2 15.99 PFlop/s 80% Lyapunov integrator
NETWEBNSE Netweb Technologies 2 8.89 PFlop/s 96% AIRAWAT-PSAI integrator
PSTGNYSE Pure Storage 3 7.57 PFlop/s 100% The F.I.N storage
6501TSE Hitachi 14 7.22 PFlop/s 79% JMA Cray XC50 cooling, cpu, integrator, interconnect, os, storage
STXNASDAQ Seagate 2 6.25 PFlop/s 52% AWE Damson storage
688041SSE Hygon 1 4.33 PFlop/s 100% Sugon Advanced Computing System PreE cpu
METANASDAQ Meta Platforms 11 3.31 PFlop/s 100% Facebook DGX-1 Cluster cooling, integrator, storage
MRVLNASDAQ Marvell 1 1.83 PFlop/s 100% Astra cpu
ORCLNYSE Oracle 14 1.62 PFlop/s 27% Red Sky cpu, integrator, interconnect, storage
AMZNNASDAQ Amazon 8 724.27 TFlop/s 67% Amazon EC2 C3 Instance Cluster accelerator, integrator, interconnect
CSCONASDAQ Cisco 3 92.44 TFlop/s 50% Thunderbird interconnect
AAPLNASDAQ Apple 1 10.28 TFlop/s 100% System X os